Google Chrome - Yet another browser enters the arena.

Wellp, I’m sure everyone’s heard, but in case you haven’t, we have another competitor for Mozilla Firefox and Internet explorer.

You can download Google Chrome at google.com/chrome.

Some of the neat features include:

  • one bar for searching AND typing in urls,
  • a very skinny tab and title bar combination,
  • a set of commonly used pages immediately viewable when you open a new tab,
  • independently-run tabs…that is, there’s no way for one tab to crash the entire browser,
  • Google’s new V8 JavaScript engine,
  • and use of WebKit to render webpages.

Here’s a quick picture in case you’re a little interested, but not interested enough to install it.

Google's new browser, Chrome.

Google Chrome

IE8 Beta 2

IE8’s Beta 2 has done away with the “Emulate IE7″ button of the first Beta, and in it’s place is “Compatibility View”, which is invoked with the broken-document button in the toolbar.

IE8 Compatibility View Button

IE8 Compatibility View Button

It’s interesting to note that  when it comes to Intranets, IE8 defaults to this compatibility setting.

Compatibility View Settings

Compatibility View Settings

One assumes Microsoft’s reasoning behind this is that they believe that the typical Intranets are not usually known as bastions of standards-based web design, and tend to be given the lowest priority in an organization. Has anyone ever worked at a place where you had full Intranet functionality on a non-IE browser? There must be some out there. I know that there are some state colleges in Florida that have banned IE from the workplace - I wonder what their Intranets look like?

Mobile Information Needs and Design

Researchers at UC San Diego conducted a diary study of 20 people’s mobile information needs over the course of two weeks (Sohn, Li et al 2008). At the end of the day their analysis shows us what users really need when their mobile and helps us design more effective mobile site profiles.

In their analysis, Sohn et al dissected 421 information needs and analyzed the heck out of them. But the most interesting findings are probably just the information needs themselves. They placed each need into one of 16 categories. The following categories occurred most frequently:

  1. Trivia (e.g. How did Bob Marley die?) : 18.5%
  2. Directions to a known destination: 13.3%
  3. Directions to a Point of Interest (destination unknown): 12.4%
  4. Friend information: 7.6%
  5. Shopping: 7.1%

Of course, you can make the common academic comment that people would make about these types of studies, which is:

“But people only think of these information needs because it’s the type of information that’s actually available on the web…if their minds were open to reporting any information need, we’d probably see a lot more variation or a lot more needs over a period of two weeks from 20 people.”

After reading the article, though, I can tell you that these researchers did a lot to try and not bias the results. I’ll let you read about their methods in the article though (linked below).

At any rate, the raw categorical data does shed some light on how you can design a site’s mobile profile to better address mobile users. For example, if you’re designing a site for a floral shop, you may want to make directions and pricing information more prominent in the mobile profile than in the large screen profile. The directions section would ideally ask someone to type in their “from” address, and submit the form to take them to a mapping service with directions to your store. The pricing section might have three elements:

  • a search box at the top for quick flower or arrangement lookups,
  • a list of 3 to 5 of the most popular flower arrangements or flowers,
  • and perhaps a one-click reservation button that allows users to reserve a flower by entering their name and date. (I can think of several friends whose anniversaries would be saved by such a feature)

Their study goes into a lot more detail about the reasons people do or don’t address their information needs while mobile, but I found those conclusions didn’t help as much as understanding the type of information users need in the first place. If you want to read more about the study, you can download it at Tim Sohn’s page at the University of California, San Diego.

Please, let me know if this type of post jives with the rest of the site and Refresh Tallahassee’s goals. If not, I could always find something else that’s closer to our mission.

Cheers!

References

Sohn, T. et al (2008).A diary study of mobile information needs. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 433-442.

To be or not to be modal

Some interesting thoughts on use of modal windows in your UI design from the Signal vs. Noise blog. Interested in your thoughts…

Holy Handheld!

Holy Handheld!

I’m sure I wasn’t the only one who was disappointed that Cardinal Ratzinger didn’t honor the memory of the previous two popes named John Paul by calling himself Pope George Ringo, but his endorsement of the mobile web is pretty impressive.

Just as impressive to me is this NY Times article on web design and the iPhone. If you’ve ever had to deal with help desk issues that were the result of a page design done by an artist with a humongous monitor (like a customer saying “I can’t see the whole page and it won’t let me scroll”) or if you just find the look of overly busy web pages to be tedious and un-user-friendly, you may enjoy this.

UI Concept for the day

Also created by Aza Raskin is a site named Songza. Though I haven’t dug into the site, check out the nice mechanism for taking more than one action on a link.

Source: Signal vs. Noise

WordPress plug-in for the day

For those of you who (like me) feel that the established interface for commenting on blog posts only works when there are a few comments… and quickly begins to suck eggs when the comment threads get longer and begin to comment on each other… I’d like to suggest Disqus. I’m going to hold off on this site until I feel that it’s justified. Anyway, here’s a screen grab to give you a better idea of the interface design:

Video for the day

Weezer \"Pork and Beans\" youtube.com video

Video from Weezer: Pork and Beans (NOTE: click image to play in new window)

Mike Houghton emailed this video to me recently. Seeing it spurred some thoughts on how Weezer took a simple idea and created something from it. In this case Weezer has taken a simple thought - “I’m going to do what I want to do, I ain’t gotta prove a thing to you” – and made a catchy little song with an amusing, light video.

I’ve been interested for a while now in how others take a simple idea and make it spring to life. I’m sure that we all have inspirational moments where if we could just somehow “catch” them and “own” them, maybe something worthwhile (or at least thought provoking) could come from them.

Refreshing!

Alton Kelly

While reading some of the obits for the late Alton Kelly, I reflected that his work and the work of his peers in San Francisco made use of the same kind of eclectic adaptation and cross-cultural borrowings as the music of the time. The SF Gate story mentions the use of the public library by Kelly and partner Stanley “Mouse” Miller to find inspiration. While the artists were in the libraries, the bands in San Francisco listened to anything and everything; check out this set from radio station KPMX one night in 1967 when it was guest-hosted by two guys named Phil Lesh and Jerry Garcia.

I found a nice selection of what look like all pre-1970 posters here (note that two of the posters are for concerts by the also recently deceased Bo Diddley).

Video for the day

So I’m imagining the actors as clients… and their physical orientation as the direction of their opinions… and wondering what I’d do if the elevator were actually a conference room, and I was presenting my opinions… perhaps about a new design. What about you?

Link courtesy of: CenterNetworks